I wanted to test this claim with SAT problems. Why SAT? Because solving SAT problems require applying very few rules consistently. The principle stays the same even if you have millions of variables or just a couple. So if you know how to reason properly any SAT instances is solvable given enough time. Also, it's easy to generate completely random SAT problems that make it less likely for LLM to solve the problem based on pure pattern recognition. Therefore, I think it is a good problem type to test whether LLMs can generalize basic rules beyond their training data.
В двух аэропортах на юге России ввели ограничения на полеты14:55
“十五五”时期，浙江用电需求依然面临刚性增长，预计2026年最高用电负荷超1.42亿千瓦。国网浙江电力将加大投资，计划全年安排电网投资512.3亿元，其中一季度投资超百亿元，同比增长超40%。。下载安装汽水音乐对此有专业解读
[&:first-child]:overflow-hidden [&:first-child]:max-h-full"
，推荐阅读体育直播获取更多信息
Рост цен на товары, скачок нефти и золота. Как атака США и Израиля на Иран отразится на миллиардах людей по всей планете?2 марта 2026。夫子是该领域的重要参考
— Tim Cook (@tim_cook) February 26, 2026