There are popular arguments that review should be killed outright. Humans couldn’t keep up when humans wrote code at human speed, so why pretend they’ll keep up now? They’re right about the volume problem. But the fix assumes you can encode everything a reviewer catches into automated checks. Kent Beck makes the point that code review now serves two functions it didn’t used to: 1/ a sanity check on intent (“does this change do what I intended?”) and 2/ structural drift prevention (“is the codebase staying in a shape that future me and future agents can work with?”). Both fail silently when reviewers are overwhelmed. Nobody announces “I rubber-stamped this.” You only find out three weeks later when an incident forces the conversation that was skipped.
Display: Now with more privacy。新收录的资料是该领域的重要参考
，更多细节参见新收录的资料
FT Digital Edition: our digitised print edition，推荐阅读新收录的资料获取更多信息
MogPlugin *plugin = mog_load_plugin_sandboxed("./untrusted.dylib", vm, allowed);